Margaret Curran's Strangly Disfunctional Memory
DEREK BATEMAN ( BBC Radio Scotland): What do we make of Denis Healey admitting that when [North Sea] oil was discovered, Labour – a Labour government, ahead of a referendum, interestingly, on the constitution of Scotland – misled, deliberately misled the Scots about the value of oil?MARGARET CURRAN MP, Shadow Secretary of State for Scotland) : Well, Derek, I don’t know anything about that, those times, I don’t know the basis on which Denis Healey said that, I don’t know the argument, I don’t know the papers around that.DB: But you’re the shadow Secretary of State for Scotland! You’re a senior Labour figure, I mean, he was a Labour chancellor.MC: I know I’m getting on a bit, but I wasn’t around in Denis Healey’s days.
Oh yes she was.
Unless
it was another Margaret Curran I met who was Secretary of Glasgow
University Labour Club, the biggest in the UK, when Healey was Labour
Chancellor in the Callaghan Government. This would have been in 1978, two
years after Healey had made global front page news and labour movement
noteriety after he went to the IMF for a bail out in exchange for huge
public spending cuts.
Indeed not only did 20 year
Margaret know who he was, but was sufficiently angry with him to be
calling for his resignation. Because, difficult though it may be to
imagine, Margaret was at that time was a prominent supporter of the
Labour left opposition . And her, "not around" line is as
credible as David Cameron claiming he was "not around"
when Thatcher introduced the Poll Tax: As credible as would the current
Secretary of Oxford University Conservative Association claiming in 30
years time he was "not around" when George Osbourne slashed
welfare budgets.
So what is it about today's Scottish
Labour Party that makes decent enough people, spout such
untruths on Scotland's national radio station? Deny their own past? Be
"not around?"
I think on this one it is
obvious. Because Margaret well remembers that, in addition to being in
the middle of an economic crisis in 1978, the Labour Party in Scotland,
and grassroots activists like her in particular, were under immense
political pressure from the SNP, which with 11 MPs at Westminster and
opinion poll rating s touching 40% threatened to wipe Labour out
whenever the next UK General Election came around. It had already near
done it in the Council elections on May 1977, where for the first time
in decades Labour had been swept from office in Glasgow. Or were you
'not around" for that either Margaret?
Like, me she
will certainly remember spending the best part of the Spring of 1978
campaigning for Donald Dewar in the knife edge Garscadden by-election,
where the SNP started as clear favorites to take Labour out in one of
its west central Scotland heartland seats, a success that would have
left every last one of them vulnerable. The SNP rallying cry at the
time? "It's Scotland's Oil", backed up by detailed proposal on how a
national oil fund in an independent Scotland could transform our country
and deliver prosperity and social justice for folks in places like
Garscadden and beyond. Folks like Margaret indeed.
Scottish
Labour, with an able candidate in Donald Dewar, set about the
nationalist claim with some gusto and effectiveness, and as a
participant, I went along with this, genuinely believing the SNP claims
were way over-hyped. I am sure Margaret then was little different from
me in this respect.
But we now find - 36 years down
the line - not only that the SNP was correct, but that the entire
Labour Cabinet at the time, Healey, the Chancellor of the Exchequer
especially, knew this but decided not to tell anyone, including Labour
activists like me and Margaret.
Now I am long out the
Labour Party, and have been lied to so often by Labour that I feel I am kind
of immune to being shocked or outraged. But this one is so close to the
bone, so central to my first experiences of serious political
campaigning that it has shocked even me. "I spent all that time, all
that energy, money I barely had, took all those early morning buses to
Drumchapel, missed out on all these social events, that Elvis Costello concert in Edinburgh,
to campaign on a lie, a lie known to the people who led that campaign?"
And not just the 1978 Garscadden by-election, but the 1979 Referendum
too. Our best argument was denied to us - by our own side.
But Margaret was "not around".
Yet
she most certainly was. Because I do remember, even if she chooses not
to. At that time Glasgow University Labour Club, with over 300
individual members, was the largest in the UK by far. It was "on the
circuit". Everyone who was anyone spoke there - Tony Benn, Neil Kinnock,
Michael Foot all regulars, as were all the leading lights in the Labour
Party in Scotland. And Margaret, as Labour Club Secretary was their
first point of contact, the facilitator. But according to her"not around". Maybe she organised it all on the internet!
One
other detail I must mention before I conclude. Margaret was a leading
light on campus in the "Labour Yes" campaign for the 1979 Referendum.
The "Labour Yes" campaign mind, not "Yes for Scotland", the all party
campaign, where those pesky "nats, liberals and commies" were also
involved. But her direct university and Labour club comrade and friend,
Johan Lamont was not. She was a leading light in the "Labour Vote No"
campaign. You read that right: Johan Lamont, in 1979 actively
campaigned against the ever so modest measure of devolution her own
Labour Government offered the people of Scotland.
Go ask Johan. Or maybe she was "not around" either.
But believe me, they both were, and very much so. Key Labour student activists, earmarked as ones to watch by Helen Liddell the then Scottish Secretary of the Labour Party, situated in Keir Hardie House just
5 minutes walk away from Glasgow University. And Margaret and Johan,
even in these days were on relaxed first name speaking terms with
Donald Dewar, John Reid, Brian Wilson, Robin Cook, John Smith, George
Foulkes, Bruce Milan......the list goes on. "Not around?"
They were part of the show.
Which comes back to my initial question. Why is Margaret denying this?
Simple
to answer: Because she needs to. Without that denial, her credibility
and the credibility of her entire generation that is now running the
Labour Party in Scotland is shot. They were mugged. We were mugged -
because I was part of it too. Scotland was mugged. Poor working class
people in Garscadden were mugged.
Some folks learn from history.
Others deny it. Repeat it.
One is the Shadow Secretary of State for Scotland
Alan Smart. Glasgow Univesity Labour Club, 1976-82. Chairperson Glasgow University
Labour Club, 1980-81, Chairperson of Scottish Organisation of Labour
Students, 1981-82. President NUS Scotland 1984-86, (elected on Labour
Student ticket)
Margaret Curran: Glasgow
University Labour Club, 1975-80. Secretary Glasgow University Labour
Club. 1978-79. Chairperson Scottish Organisation of Labour Students
1979-80)
For Margaret (That history degree she got don't seem too have done her much good) :
Denis Healey. Chancellor of The Exchequer, 1974-79. Deputy Leader of the Labour Party 1980-83.
Here in full is what Dennis Healey told Holyrood Magazine in May 2013:
Footnote:
Many have commented that, with the exception of the bold Derek Batemen
on his BBC Radio Scotland programme, and unlike the rest of the media,
including STV, BBC Scotland's coverage of this major admission by
arguably the most important Labour politician of the late 1970s early
80s period has been near non existent, especially on TV. There may be
many explanations for this. Here is a possible one:
John Boothman,
Present Head of News and Current Affairs, BBC Scotland: Chairperson of
Strathclyde University Labour Club 1979, Chairperson Scottish
Organisation of Labour Students 1980-81. Chairperson of the National (UK)
Organisation of Labour Students 1981-2. Around at the time? For sure.
5 comments:
Too right, Alan. I was in Glasgow Uni Labour Club, 1980-82 (unlike Margaret, I am honest about my past and admit to being an upstartish tw*t), and remember Margaret vividly. My sharpest memory is of her calling for us to formally support Michael Foot for the leadership.
Paul Davis
Erm - is it meant to be
" strangly" for she sure strangles the language with the pace of her speech or is it meant to be " strangely"?
Excellent information.
Excellent piece of contemporary Political History Alan, makes it difficult for those in power these days to lie when so many of us were at university with them - you in Glasgow with most of the big Labour names me in Edinburgh with Gordon Brown to name but one.
Re Curran's denial of saying she backed a nations right to self determination, she also did it on the STV nightly politics programme part of which is on YouTube.
These people really do 'employ' short term memory strategies do they not? Thank God for the internet and a growing number of guys like you who have seen through the con of unionist parties and are happy to 'tell all'. Thanks for that.
Its a bit like the hoary old tale that "the SNP let the Tories in in 1979; when in fact it was in fighting within the Labour ranks which caused the demise of the Labour Government. In his memoirs, “Time and Chance”, the then Prime Minister Jim Callaghan noted:
“ In his (i.e. Michael Cox, Labour’s Chief Whip) view, the difficulty within the (Labour) Party, was much greater than any from the Scottish National Party, and the Whip’s judgement was that the government could not rely on the votes of Labour members from the north if we moved to reject the Repeal Order......... we could lose the vote.”
In short, Labour back benchers, including Neil Kinnock, Brian Wilson et al, would have preferred, not just to see, but to participate in, the demise of their own government, rather than honour Labour’s manifesto commitment to the Scottish people, by establishing the Assembly which Scots had already voted ‘yes’ for in the Referendum.
The extent to which some Labour anti Devolutionists were prepared to go can be summed up in the words of Patrick Cosgrave in his book ‘The Lives of Enoch Powell’ when he wrote “Confidential exchanges took place between Thatcher’s aides and a number of Labour back benchers hostile to Devolution”
Funny how history has a nasty habit of coming back to bite you!
The list of ideas presented can really be incorporated in daily life. Reading extensively is the building block to build a house of vocabulary. But just reading can't help to build the house alone, there are other necessary items required. So to unlock all the necessary items required visit www.vocabmonk.com
Post a Comment